Excerpt from

Jean Stewart, The Body's Memory

The Intake Interview

    THEY REMIND ME of IRS auditors, "implementing policy,  "expediting paperwork" with an
earnest, blockheaded zeal that confounds me, makes me want to laugh, cry, scream.
     I don't buy their occasional self-deprecating apologies for "all the red tape," no, not for one minute. They believe in it. It is this belief that gives rise to their placid sadism, that fundamentally divides me from them, a division as deep, it seems to me now, as that between poor and rich. They believe in the inevitability (and therefore the necessity) of their piles of forms full of prying, suspicious questions.
     The questions are endless. The ones they already asked over the phone they ask again, along with an infinity of others. There's a numbing list of documents to be compiled and fur nished to my counselor" (she's going to counsel me?), demonstrating that I am who I say I am (social security card), was born when I say I was born (birth certificate), reside where 1 claim to reside (driver's license, car registration, utility bills), and am in fact truly disabled (complete medical records, including surgical reports, names and addresses of all doctors who ever treated me for my Disabling Condition, a recent letter from my current doctor affirming that I am indeed still disabled). I must furnish proof that I am Employable and that I have not set my Vocational Goals too high (full job history, including the exact nature of my assignment at each job, how long I held the post, what I earned, why I left).
    Have I ever been diagnosed as having a mental or emotional disorder? Any history of substance abuse?
    Have I been hospitalized for mental or emotional disorders or substance abuse?
    In treatment now? For what? Take any meds?
    Ever been arrested? Convicted? Of what?
    What are my personal-care needs? Have I ever required any "special accommodations" on the job? What were they?
    Am I Certified Disabled?
    I ponder the source from which these questions spring. Prizing open the skull of this genial, neatly groomed woman who faces me-her desk a sort of shield to keep me from advancing too close- I find a cluster of assumptions:  (1) The client-applicant is ineligible for services until proven eligible. (2) The client-applicant's Vocational  Goals  are  outlandish,  greedy, arrogant, must be trimmed down to appropriately humble scale. (3) The client-applicant's motive in seeking services is, until proven otherwise, to rip off the system. (4) The function of the Agency is to facilitate (favorite word) adaptation (second favorite) of client to job (client to world), not the reverse. (5) The client is a fraud. (6) The client is helpless.
    Most pervasive of all, this last;  its condescending flicker turns up everywhere. Peel back the protestations of the most dedicated, selfless, even noble social worker, and there it 15: the client is helpless. Help the client. (See Spot run.)
    I sit, politely answering my counselor's questions. Somewhere in the large, low-ceilinged, factorylike space, subdivided by cheap modular partitions into dozens of small work are~s, a copy machine hums, a typewriter clatters. Low murmur of indistinguishable voices from adjacent stalls. Smells of copy machine fluid and Mrs. Lowery-the-Counselor's hair spray.
    I try to focus, but my mind strays to the others, glimpsed in passing (I asked directions to the bathroom in order to see what I could along the way), sitting opposite their own counselors in their own separate cubicles. (Undergoing their own Intake Interviews?) Patient bewilderment sags their shoulders. I search their expressions and what I see is offense, as if someone has just deliberately burped in their faces and they, embarrassed, taken aback, too dignified or fearful to return the insult, carefully pretend it was a sneeze: God bless you, they say.
    So much hanging in the balance: a piece of equipment, a training program, something so costly one could save for years and never afford it. The distribution of power so terribly skewed, and so consistent in its terribleness: people in wheelchairs beseeching people who walk~ people who can't hear beseeching people who can. Entr~ting not for a place in the sun but for crumbs, crumbs left on someone else's plate: If there's enough money in the budget after we buy our new computer, we'll see about your college education.
    And how many will be persistent and resourceful enough to survive this paralyzing gauntlet? (If they weren't Certified Disabled when they came in, they will be when they leave.) How many will stay with it and assemble all the necessary documents, believing in their hearts that they're deserving, cleaving to this faith, undaunted even by the Agency's most degrading questions? The coveted equipment, the training program transmuted into handouts, not entitlements. And who would quarrel with that most fundamental code of justice: For handouts, you gotta scrape.
. . . . . . . .
 

    Mostly it's been a hard and lonely private struggle, though, since until recently I counted among the people close to me no disabled women who could provide role models, in terms of helping me carve out for myself a new sexual identity. When I found them-my new friend Sheba and others, gay and straight, whose manner and bearing sent a clear message --I know my own worth, and those who choose not to see it are the losers-- they served as beacons for me. My presence, my personal way of being in the world, underwent a sea change.
    It had to do with how they held their heads. How some women in manual chairs jumped curbs, practical, preoccupied with getting from here to there. (It wasn't the wheelies  themselves, athleticism per se has no hold on me. It was that style!) How they entered rooms full of non-disabled people sitting straight, as if they had a right. How, breathing into fat-ribbed respirator tubes, certain quadriplegic women paused to smile. How respirator breathing could seem suddenly sexy in a way that dragging on Virginia Slims never would, when at the end of that tube there flashed the briefest, most spectacular of smiles.
    Mark, it was the Respirator Women who gave me permission to have a disability, whose casual grace finally shamed me into ownership. The Respirator Women, whose heads didn't move, nor their pinky fingers, nor their toes, had minds that did.  Oh the tragedy, I used to whine inwardly, thinking myself empathetic, until a Respirator Woman grinned. Imagine, I would brood, being trapped inside a body (standard pop media fare, that; I didn't know better)-----until a Respirator Woman winked at me.
 What was that wink saying? What an interesting business, I decided it said, meaning life. It might even have been saying, What fun. Either way it posed problems. How could life be interesting, let alone fun, for trapped people? They must be fooling themselves, or perhaps I was misreading those sassy grins. But how could I be that far off? Clearly they were not saying Poor me, which is what the media seemed to be saying they were saying, or rather, seemed to feel they should be saying.
    (Actually, the more I think about it, the more it appears to me that the media wants it both ways. Journalists, TV and film directors, and screenwriters seem to want to do poor-them stories ad nauseam about the Respirator Women, but woe unto her who actively solicits this response. Self- pity is unseemly, not to mention tacky, when publicly displayed. It strikes me now as not unlike-- you'll appreciate the analogy--our culture's old sexual double standard toward women, i.e., we're attractive only so long as we re "innocent";  if we try to be sexy, we deserve whatever we get.)
. . . . . . .
 

    Shall I tell you a little story, Mark? Some time ago, on a long train ride, I met an awed couple who later confessed that they'd made a point of introducing themselves to me in order to find out if I was "for real." "You don't seem handicapped," they said, thinking themselves complimentary--can you beat it?--going on to explain that while they'd seen lots of TV productions about "courageous people who've overcome their handicaps, who can do any-thing," they'd "never really met one in person.
    "Till there was youuuu"' I barely stopped myself from crooning. Irrepressible (and unfair, Peter tells me) ridicule foamed like acid in my mouth; I wanted to squash their cheap idolatry and rub it in their placid faces. Nondisabled people seem obsessed with this moral principle that we should "overcome" our disabilities, as if we live our whole lives locked in mortal combat with our bodies. As for me, I'm mostly content with mine, which is not to deny that I live a life of perpetual active combat, but rather to say that my body is the least of my adversaries.
    People who "can do anything." Well well. My admirers had met their first Supercrip. What exactly had they observed me doing that made them think I could do anything?
    Let's see. First of all, I got on the train. Given the inaccessibility of that train (in violation of federal law), getting on meant asking for help. Did that qualify me as Supercrip?
    Combat, to be sure. . . But with whom, over what?
    Later, stomach growling, I asked the porter about meals. He mentioned the dining car, fourteen cars away. I asked if a meal could be delivered to my seat and he assured me that it could, for an additional fee of only three-fifty. My choices seemed clear: pay the service fee (I didn't have it, and wouldn't have paid it if I had), or refuse to pay on the grounds that it discriminated against people whocouldn't get to the dining car. (The train's aisles were too narrow for wheelchairs-not that they could have boarded in the first place-and fourteen jerking, jiggling cars was far too long and hazardous a hike for someone on crutches.)
    But taking such a stand on a disability matter was not (yet) my style;  besides, nothing on the short take-out list appealed to me. (Many items on the regular menu were not considered take-out foods.) I was seething, though hardly a disability rights crusader at the time, I knew even then that I had a right to order whatever I damned well pleased on that menu.
    Leave it to me to be stirred to revolution by matters of food.
    My third option, and the one I finally chose, was to find a way down to the dining car. Never having been in or even seen one, I found this choice by far the most appealing, evoking Cary Grant scenes of conviviality, romance. It should be noted that my Pullman car had been booked not for luxury's sake-I was living on welfare at the time, so a friend footed the bill-but out of medical necessity: a Pullman gave me my only chance to elevate the bad leg. Still, I fell in love with that car---its leather seats, its exotic smell of privilege---for the first three hours or so, until I began to feel that oppressive loneliness that too often seems to accompany "medical necessity." Lap of luxury notwithstanding, my Pullman cut me off from everyone else on that train. By dinnertime it had begun to feel like solitary confinement, I was desperate for another human face.
    Hence my determination to get to the dining car. And get there I did, carried high above the narrow aisles of fourteen cars by strong and chivalrous passengers. (Transit employees were instructed not to get involved, for liability reasons.)
    A set of ordinary impulses-to travel by public transportation, to eat in a public place-were insultingly thwarted, leading me to a set of equally ordinary emotional responses which in turn led me to act. Which so impressed these people that they concluded I could "do anything."
 

PASSING
You don't seem handicapped,
she said. You seem like an ordinary
person who just happens to be sitting
in a chair with wheels instead of legs.
You look like any minute you'll
get up and walk away from it,
like you just sat down in it
for a moment's leisure in your busy
day. You look like being handicapped
is just one part of you, like being
blonde. You don't look like you've taken
root in that chair, like some fungus
has attached you to the seat. You look
like you have better things to do
with your life than sit around
in a wheelchair feeling sorry
for yourself. You look like someone
who eats eggs and toast in the morning,
not intravenous protein. You look
mainstream, you look cool. Your body
looks whole, and your mind.
You don't drool, jerk,
or twitch. You don't embarrass
us or make us feel guilty.
You don't make our skin crawl.
If you sat in a regular chair,
you could pass.